Practice 77 · Part 8: Nonfiction, research, and truth

Preserve Quotation Integrity

The maximQuote faithfully and preserve context and provenance.

Misquotations often come by relay rather than by forgery. Each writer takes the line from the one before, and nobody goes back to the page.

In the sixth book of Rousseau’s Confessions, a young man who wants bread but is too embarrassed to walk into a baker’s shop recalls the expedient of “une grande princesse.” Told that the peasants had no bread, she is supposed to have answered: Qu’ils mangent de la brioche. Rousseau does not name her. Accounts differ on the year he wrote the passage, 1765 or about 1767, but either way Marie Antoinette, born in 1755, was then a child in Vienna who had not yet seen France. The line travels today under her name, and in English under the word cake. Somewhere along the relay it was detached from its source, handed to the person it best suits, and translated into something else.

Faithful quotation keeps the words exact, with every alteration marked by an ellipsis or a bracket. It preserves the context: what came before and after, who was speaking to whom, and for what purpose. The attribution has to be right, including which version you read. And there has to be a path back, so that a reader, or you in a year, can retrieve the original.

None of that requires every quotation to be verbatim to the syllable. Thucydides says plainly what he did with the speeches in his history. They were hard to carry word for word in memory, so his habit was to make the speakers say what the occasion in his opinion demanded, “adhering as closely as possible to the general sense.” The method is defensible because it is declared, and the same reconstruction presented as transcript would not be. Today’s equivalent is the note: reconstructed from my notes, translated by me, lightly edited for length. Speech often does not read well verbatim, and oral-history and interview work routinely trims it for readability, which is acceptable when the trimming is disclosed and the meaning is untouched. When only the content matters, paraphrase is often better than a quotation. Some provenance cannot be recovered at all, a conversation twenty years old, for instance, and then you drop the quotation marks and say “as I remember it” (Practice 71).

A quotation is a claim about a past utterance, and the reader cannot check it. Provenance makes the claim checkable in principle and keeps the writer honest in practice, because a year from now you will not remember whether a line came from the book, from an article that quoted the book, or from a screenshot. The Society of Professional Journalists’ code says to identify sources clearly and to provide access to source material when it is relevant and appropriate. A written record of where each quotation came from lets you answer a challenge years later.

AI-assisted research has already failed here in documented ways. In 2025 an academic, Christopher Rudge, found that a report Deloitte produced for the Australian Department of Employment and Workplace Relations contained references that did not exist and, according to reporting by the Australian Financial Review and The Register, a fabricated quotation attributed to a Federal Court judgment. The corrected version, dated 26 September 2025 and posted on 3 October, deleted or fixed the faulty references and disclosed in its methodology that a generative AI tool chain (Azure OpenAI GPT-4o) had been used for one part of the technical review. Deloitte agreed to repay the final installment of its fee. Rudge observed that where the corrected version dropped a fake reference, it sometimes put five, six, seven or eight in its place, which, he said, suggested that the original claim “wasn’t based on any one particular evidentiary source.” A reference attached after a claim was written proves nothing about where the claim came from. Deloitte did not say the tool caused the errors, and nothing here claims that it did.

Whatever the cause, every quotation, citation and biographical detail that comes from an AI tool must be checked against the original text before it enters a manuscript. If you cannot find the original, the quotation does not go in.

Practice. Build a provenance record for every quotation in one chapter. For each, note the exact words; the speaker or author; when, where and to whom they were said or written; the medium; the version you actually read (edition and page, or URL and date accessed); whether you saw the original or someone’s quotation of it; and every alteration you made. Then check each against the original and date the check. A quotation you cannot trace is paraphrased, qualified or cut. A chapter takes ninety minutes. A spreadsheet will do for the record, and so will any research tool that ties a note to its source.

  1. 71Label the Kind of Knowing
  2. 72Match Evidence to Consequence
  3. 75Shape Facts Without Distorting Them